Introduction On August 8, 2025, the Delhi High Court refused to dismiss an FIR filed against Kumar Mangat Pathak, producer of Drishyam 2, related to a ₹4.3 crore fraud investigation involving the film’s overseas distribution rights. Justice Neena Krishna Bansal ruled that as the investigation is ongoing and Pathak has cooperated, judicial intervention was premature. …
Delhi HC Rejects Producer’s Plea to Dismiss FIR in Drishyam 2 Rights Fraud Case: Full Story
Introduction
On August 8, 2025, the Delhi High Court refused to dismiss an FIR filed against Kumar Mangat Pathak, producer of Drishyam 2, related to a ₹4.3 crore fraud investigation involving the film’s overseas distribution rights. Justice Neena Krishna Bansal ruled that as the investigation is ongoing and Pathak has cooperated, judicial intervention was premature.
Details of the Allegations
The FIR filed by Delhi Police’s Economic Offences Wing alleges that a businessman was defrauded via a fake distribution agreement claiming exclusive Chinese-language rights for Drishyam 2 in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. The case accuses Pathak and others of conspiracy, forgery, and misrepresentation.
Role of Middleman Bharat Sevak
The complainant claims Bharat Sevak, posing as Panorama Studios’ authorized representative, offered the deal and allegedly received ₹15.75 crore out of ₹16.40 crore. Panorama Studios denied receiving any payment and stated that Sevak’s authorization had lapsed prior to the transaction.
Court Proceedings and Arguments
Pathak’s lawyers maintained the dispute was commercial, not criminal, and emphasized his cooperation with the investigation and exploration of other legal options. The Delhi High Court, however, declined to quash the FIR or halt the probe.
Conclusion
The Delhi HC’s decision to uphold the FIR reflects its commitment to allowing thorough investigations in fraud cases involving the entertainment industry, even when key accused cooperate.
